Home 

Helpful Things

Sitemap

Risk Management

  Causation Model

Plan-Train-Do Model

  Process 

 Process Rating

 System

System Content

  System Structure

TopChem example

  Good Management Practices

Links

© 2001 Topves

CONTACT

Looking for a program to build websites?

website design software

 

 

Selected Safety Management Activity Areas 

Topves

Content 5.0.2. My choice

The main issues to consider in selecting the risk / safety management activity areas that should be part of your management system are:

bullet

the risks involved in your operation

bullet

your own ideas as to what makes things work for you

bullet

important third party requirements - what others think you must or should do

You will have to determine - together with your colleagues and possibly with some help of external parties - what need to be in you management system. Don't make it too big though with too much detail. But make sure you have included the right structure that ensures implementation and periodic evaluation so you can extend or alter your system based on experience and results.

Using my own experience and looking at the external sources (5.0.1.)  I made my own selection. I did that so it may further explain what I am talking about and it may also assist you in your thinking. When making my own choice as to what could/should be in a management system, I assumed a mid-size chemical company that I called TopChem. TopChem has a corporate office and locations in a number of countries. You will find some further detail in the TopChem example. The detail will be limited as I am treating this on a corporate level - it would cost me too much imagination to work this out further on a subsidiary level. 

I considered four "phases" in making the TopChem management system. My assumption is that you built a (production) process such that it is safe to operate, including the relevant issues: hardware (plant), software (procedures), human ware (people) and their interfaces. "Safe to operate" means that only expected  losses will occur and that those will be within the acceptance levels set for the operation. Preparing for safe building (process or operation design) is a major phase as errors made then will be difficult and costly to correct later. Once you have built it safe to operate (meeting the appropriate design criteria) it is a matter of keeping it at that level and improve as appropriate due to internal or external factors - safe now will not be safe tomorrow due to experiences gained, changing legislation etc. 

The four phases are:

bullet

preparing for making the operation safe to operate (initial design, detailed design)

bullet

building it safe to operate (construction)

bullet

maintaining it safe to operate (operational phase)

bullet

improve as necessary due to internal and external factors (operational phase)

(Prepare)

  1. Management leadership / culture 

  2. Risk assessment of / legislation concerning :

  1. Processes

  2. Products

  3. Goods/materials

  4. Installation / workplace

  5. Tasks to be carried out / procedures 

  6. Personnel (incl. management / supervision)

  7. Third party services

  1. External communication

  2. Information & documentation

  3. Obtain (design/purchase) safe level of

  1. Processes (d)

  2. Products (d)

  3. Goods/materials (p)

  4. Installation / workplaces (d)

  5. Work instructions / procedures (d)

  6. Personnel (incl. management / supervision) (p)

  7. Third party services (p)  

  1. Training

(Build)

  1. Construction and start-up

(Maintain)

  1. Inspections and maintenance

  2. Critical task observations

  3. Behavior management

  4. Modification management

  5. Internal communication 

  6. Emergency planning and preparedness

( Improve)

  1. Accident / incident investigation & analysis

  2. Audits

  3. Reviews

In practice phases will (or may seem to) overlap as certain activities of the prepare phase will also be evident during the operational phase. This is why I put the headings between brackets and you could actually leave them out all-together. For example, you could have extensions or alterations to existing operations that will require the entire process to be done again (for that extension/change as well as for the interfaces with existing operations). But my argument could also be that "modification management" (item 11) would take care of that: any deviation from normal operation (no matter how large or small) should  come under modification management and through that the sequence starting with "preparation" will start again.

    

THE principle of MANAGEMENT RESULTS

 "A manager tends to secure most effective results - through and with others - by performing the management work of planning, organizing, leading and controlling."