Management System Success is Management Success

   

 Looking for SUCCESS? In safety, or in any other area?

Interested? Go to the Succes in Safety page and have a look at PDF copies of my two books:

Risk Management, Safety and Control of Loss - Protecting Your Organization

Making Your Future - In Business and in Other Parts of Life 

 

 

 
Success in Safety Improvement Model Management System Success Improvement Process 17-Step Process Improvement Process Rating Management System Structure Management System Content Improving the Management System The Audit Management System Rating International Safety Rating System Accidents and Incidents Accident Investigation Protocol Safety Opinion Survey My books


Incident Recall - to find the Events that did not get Reported

Incident recall is the to help people remember events that could have led to undesired consequences. These unwanted events can help to learn and to improve the management system but unfortunately, for one reason or the other, do not get reported.

 

Practically all accident / incident ratio studies show that there are many more incidents - unsafe of "substandard" acts and conditions - than accidents. They form a large body of information to improve organizational performance, when reported. In most companies, however, incident reporting is weak. The purpose of incident recall is aimed at uncovering more of this valuable information. 

 

One of the more well-known accident / incident ratio studies is the one that was carried out under guidance of Frank E. Bird, Jr. in 1969. At that time Mr. Bird was working with INA (Insurance Company of North America) in Philadelphia as Director of Engineering; prior to his position with INA, Mr. Bird was with Lukens Steel in Coatesville, Pa. as the safety and health manager. In 1966, together with George Germain, he wrote the book "Damage Control" linking material damage accidents to injuries and thus dramatically expanding the safety scope. 

 

 

 

Accident Recall - looking for unwanted events that did not get reported

 

The above study - the most extensive accident ratio study ever carried out - revealed that there are many more incidents than accidents, many more opportunities to learn and improve.

 

Why are incidents not reported?

  

Many of us have experienced incidents, near-accidents or close calls. At work or at home. Many of us did not share the information with others. 

If everybody knew how important incidents are as part of an improvement process, many more would be reported. But often, they are not. Some of the reasons why this important information is lost are: 

  • Fear of discipline
  • Concern about the record  
  • Concern about reputation  
  • Fear of medical treatment  
  • Dislike of medical personnel  
  • Desire to avoid work interruption  
  • Desire to keep personal record clear  
  • Avoidance of red tap  
  • Concern about the attitude of others  
  • Poor understanding of the importance  
Learning from unwanted events that did not get reported

 

The objective of Incident Recall is to uncover incidents that people "forgot" to report. The overall objective is to get a sufficient number - all? - of incidents reported so that you can learn from them. Incident Recall is part of that effort. 

 

In order to learn from incidents, they need to be known and there are several sources, other than Incident Recall, to find out about them: 

 

Inspections

 

Inspections normally are carried out at regular intervals. These are planned, formal inspections carried out by individuals or by teams.

 

Checklists are often used to guide the inspection process and serve as memory joggers allowing sharing of experience between the more skilled inspectors and those still learning the job.

 

During inspections substandard of unsafe conditions are noticed. These conditions did not occur by themselves - they were caused, most likely because someone did something or someone did not do something (right). Unfortunately, deviations noted (the "unwanted event") during inspections are normally not analyzed for their causes. Normal practice is that they are corrected, probably noted on a form and that's about it! If that is the way it is done, it is also an opportunity lost to prevent the same conditions from happening again.  

 

Informal "inspections" have the same purpose of the formal inspection. Only they are not planned and checklists are not used.  

 

Observations

 

Behavior observations are like inspections. Only now they are directed at what people do and how they do it. In practice, however, the people carrying out behavior observations often tend to focus on conditions rather than what people do. Focussing on conditions is easier than observations and addressing people about what they do wrong. 

 

Critical task observations are observations of how critical tasks are being carried out. These observations form part of training / instruction.  They are a good way to see that these tasks are properly being carried out according to procedures of work instructions - the "standard way of doing the work" that should have been part of the training / instruction. Critical task observations form an excellent source to find deviations that could lead to accidents. They are also a good means to see if existing procedures, work environments or tools need to be adapted.

 

Unsafe or substandard acts / condition reporting systems

 

The substandard act / condition reporting could be included in the accident investigation protocol. Basically there are two formal systems to report acts/conditions : 

  • paper system 
  • electronic system  

Both systems use a relatively simple form to be filled out. The form should go to a coordination point where a person decides whether or not the condition or act reported should be further processed depending on the risk classification level determined. .

 

Incident Recall

 

Accident or Incident Recall is a structured process of communication / interviewing to uncover events that could have resulted in unwanted consequences - events that may be used for learning before they get lost. 

 

The interviewing could be done by a supervisor/manager or by a staff person more experienced in interviewing techniques. It could be done on a one-on-one basis or as a group exercise. The latter is probably the better approach but requires a non-blame fixing culture in which people are attuned to helping each other to prevent accidents.

 

Should you investigate all minor or no-loss events?

I do not think so. You want as many as possible reported and you want to record them for trend evaluation and you want to know what these small losses cost you per period.

After they have been reported, recalled or imagined, use a risk classification tool to find the high potential (HIPO) events that could lead to serious loss and carry out a cause analyses on those.

Giving too much attention to events that will not and cannot generate important losses may lead to demotivation of people, including management.

NEXT PAGE is Accidents Imaging

If you want to read my website pages from the beginning go to: THE HOME PAGE

 

 

  

 
View Willem Top's profile on LinkedIn  
 
Search website
 
© Copyright 2001/2012 Willem Top